Experts: Amazon headquarters try good for Little Rock

Benefits seen for later project bids


Little Rock's attempt to land Amazon's second headquarters will be good experience for the city, two Arkansas economists said Tuesday.

Reader poll

Should Little Rock submit an application for Amazon's second headquarters?

  • Yes, it's worth it for a project that could bring great things to the city 67% 169 votes
  • No, the city doesn't fulfill the qualifications and it's not worth the effort 32% 81 votes

250 total votes.

This story is only available from the Arkansas Online archives. Stories can be purchased individually for $2.95. Click here to search for this story in the archives.


RBear says...

Even though I've already written about why I don't think Little Rock is even in the first cut, I agree it's good to put together a bid to allow the city to look at where we stand in the key areas any company would look at for location or relocation of offices. You don't know until you self-evaluate and that's what this is. I do caution on city officials making false statements about our current state. Stodola's coment about a deep talent pool in Little Rock are misleading. If the pool was so deep, it wouldn't be so hard to find that talent for some of the tech jobs I've seen posted for Little Rock companies. Our tech pool is shallow, except when Acxiom goes through a layoff spree.
But just putting a bid together isn't enough. From there you need to focus on how to close the gaps you find with policy, projects, and people. Take for example, our anemic public transit system. It's a great basic system and its current director is doing the best with what he has. But it's no where near where it needs to be to address the needs of an urban core, much less a major corporate campus like HQ2.
Follow that with our public school system. You can bet Amazon will be looking at that when considering HQ2, even though it's not directly called out in the bid RFP. As its employees locate or relocate to the campus, they want good innovative schools around them. Yes, they'll probably focus on the private system as well since they'll have the income and eSTEM can help meet those needs. But many will want to send their kids to public school and we are just not there yet.
It'll be interesting to see what bid Little Rock puts forth. I hope it will be available to the public to review so we can ALL see where the gaps are. Then we can collectively work as a community to help fill those gaps.

Posted 13 September 2017, 6:56 a.m. Suggest removal

NoUserName says...

1. No, there is NO tech talent pool in LR. We've tried to hire. Stodola isn't misleading, he's wrong. Speaking of tech, what's going on with the waste of money Tech Park?
2. LR does not have the population to support robust (i.e. convenient) mass transit. When it takes <30 minutes to get to work, people aren't going to take a bus. This won't be a case of if you build it...
3. The LRSD won't improve until current leadership is gone. When two former school board members, who were part of the problem, can file suit claiming long-term racial disparity in a district they had control of, for the sole purpose of disrupting the state, the system is broken.
This bid is a joke. Done because Stodola is trying to show that he's doing something for the city. Speaking of which, it's time we simply abolish either the Mayor or City Manager position. We don't need a two headed government anymore. Maybe we can put that $500k toward Bear's mass transit.

Posted 13 September 2017, 8:19 a.m. Suggest removal

billyo says...

LR must solve its crime problem before it becomes even remotely attractive to any new business.

Posted 13 September 2017, 8:24 a.m. Suggest removal

applegg says...

This is a total joke. There is no technical talent pool in Little Rock. None of the other criteria are met either. A waste of time and effort. Not to mention crime and the fact that anyone who can afford it sends their kids to private schools.

Posted 13 September 2017, 1:05 p.m. Suggest removal

DoubleBlind says...

I agree that LR has no shot at being selected but I would ask those whose comments suggest the attempt is not worth the effort to throttle your feedback. I have no doubt LR will be eliminated but Amanzon's response should be shared widely and thoroughly assessed to determine areas AR needs to improve in order to be competitive moving forward. I was originally completely dismissive. I now believe this to be a very worthwhile effort. No doubt the feedback will be brutal, but coming from an org like Amazaon and thousands of jobs at stake, LR has no alternative but to address it.

Posted 13 September 2017, 1:38 p.m. Suggest removal

Log in to comment