Login

ADVERTISEMENT

The war against straws

Under a new law passed in Santa Barbara, Calif., this July, restaurant employees can face misdemeanor charges for handing out plastic straws to customers. The first offense is a written warning, but if workers are caught violating the law a second time, they can face up to six months in jail or up to a $1,000 fine.

This law is the latest development in a month that has seen a political war waged against the use of plastic straws. At the beginning of July a new law went into effect banning the use of plastic straws and utensils by bars and restaurants within Seattle city limits. A couple of weeks later San Francisco's board of supervisors unanimously approved a ban on plastic straws within that city.

Such bans are forcing restaurant owners either to abandon plastic straws altogether or switch to more expensive alternatives. While the prohibitions are based on concerns about plastic pollution, the substitutes for plastic cost substantially more without being significantly better for the environment.

Take, for example, paper straws. They can cost as much as 22 times more than plastic straws and come with their own set of environmental problems. Paper production has a much larger environmental footprint than plastic production.

Corn-based (PLA) straws are cheaper to make than paper straws, but they are still almost six times more expensive than plastic straws. PLA is marketed as a compostable plastic, but is not compostable in the traditional sense. PLA degrades in about two to three months, but only if it is processed at an industrial composting facility that continually subjects waste to heat and microbes. Otherwise it may take just as long to decompose as traditional plastics.

Reusable straw and utensil options like stainless steel and bamboo have large upfront costs and do not make sense for small takeout food vendors. Both must be cleaned and sterilized for reuse, requiring hot water and detergents that can damage bamboo straws. Steel smelting and bamboo harvesting also come with their own sets of environmental problems.

Perhaps the tradeoffs are worth it. After all, plastic pollution in the ocean, in public parks, and on beaches are growing concerns.

If lawmakers want to promote meaningful change, they should focus on creating incentives and good institutions for managing plastic waste and leave it to private businesses to change the way Americans consume plastic. Seattle's own Starbucks recently announced that it will no longer offer plastic straws, and many restaurants around the country are opting for plastic alternatives or straw-only-upon-request policies. Such measures allow businesses with the means and desire to reduce plastic waste the option of doing so, without unduly burdening smaller businesses and the people who work for them.

------------v------------

Brian Isom is a research manager at the Center for Growth and Opportunity at Utah State University and a policy fellow at the Independent Institute. William F. Shughart II, research director of the Independent Institute, is J. Fish Smith Professor in Public Choice at Utah State's Huntsman School of Business.

Editorial on 08/09/2018

Comments

DoubleBlind says...

Why not just eliminate them altogether? Why is that not presented as an option by the idiot Isom? Wouldn’t eliminating straws altogether save businesses the most money? We don’t get a straw when we buy a cup of coffee. The lid has a little peel-back tab that we simply peel back to create an opening from which to drink. Why not simply use that lid type on cold drinks and eliminate any need for straws.

Posted 9 August 2018, 6:58 a.m. Suggest removal

Log in to comment