Login

ADVERTISEMENT

VIDEO: At start of fiscal session, Arkansas governor talks of cutting top income tax rate

photo.caption|escapejs

Gov. Asa Hutchinson began this year's fiscal session Monday with a call to cut the state's top income tax rate from 6.9 percent to 6 percent when lawmakers meet in 2019, a proposal that would amount to the biggest slash in state revenues since the Republican took office in 2015.

During each of the two general legislative sessions in Hutchinson's first term, the governor steered through tax cuts for middle and then low-income Arkansans. The total cost of those cuts each year is expected to be around $150 million. On Monday, Hutchinson's office said his proposed tax cut for the state's top earners would reduce revenues by $180 million.

Arkansans earning more than $75,000 a year would see a tax cut under the plan, according to a spokesman. The governor's previous cuts affected people earning less than that.

"It is important that we achieve this in order to have continued success in economic achievement and job growth," Hutchinson said in an address to both chambers of the General Assembly. He said an ongoing task force would examine ways to reduce revenues without harming services.

[DOCUMENT: Read the governor's full speech]

Hutchinson's tax cut proposal, however, is not the issue at hand for legislators during the 2018 fiscal session.

Lawmakers are being asked to renew funding for the state's "private option" Medicaid expansion program, which provided health insurance to about 285,000 low-income Arkansas.

In past sessions, support for the Medicaid expansion program has been difficult to find among conservative Republicans who are averse to the cost, which is mostly paid for with federal dollars. Funding for the program, also called Arkansas Works, has been approved in the past by slim margins.

In his speech, Hutchinson told lawmakers he expects President Donald Trump's administration to approve a waiver before the end of the session that would allow Arkansas to add a work requirement for Arkansas Works recipients.

Upon convening for the session, House lawmakers approved a resolution setting the length of the fiscal session at up to 45 days.

Read Tuesday's Arkansas Democrat-Gazette for full details.

β€” John Moritz

12:50 P.M. UPDATE:

LITTLE ROCK β€” Arkansas lawmakers have kicked off a legislative session focused on a proposed $5.6 billion budget for the coming year and still face questions about whether there will be enough support to keep the state's hybrid Medicaid expansion alive.

[πŸ†•: Sign up for the Arkansas politics and legislative updates email newsletter]

The House and Senate convened Monday for the start of this year's fiscal session, the fifth under a 2008 constitutional amendment that requires the Legislature to meet and budget annually. It'll take a two-thirds vote of both chambers for any non-budget bills to even be considered during the abbreviated session.

Republican Gov. Asa Hutchinson's budget proposal projects a $64 million surplus, most of which he's proposed setting aside as a reserve fund that he says can set the stage for future tax cuts. The remaining surplus money would go toward highway needs.

Check back for updates and read Tuesday's Arkansas Democrat-Gazette for full details.

β€” The Associated Press

Comments

Foghorn says...

This article conveniently fails to mention that the first piece of legislation put forth for consideration in this FISCAL session was about GUNS. What in the holy heII does gun legislation have to do with the BUDGET?! These gaping @ssholes are pathologically incapable of focusing on anything that isn’t gods, guns, gays or gynecology related.

Posted 12 February 2018, 1:58 p.m. Suggest removal

pfaver says...

Why not create a 100% state income tax deduction for donating to a state owned charity so we get our charitable deduction on the federal taxes instead of losing the deduction as a state tax. California is proposing this. They are not the only high tax state where people are losing state tax deductions. Repubs did this to punish California but it will hurt Arkansans also.

Posted 12 February 2018, 4:59 p.m. Suggest removal

GeneralMac says...

If you want to know how ridiculously high the Arkansas State Income tax is , allow me to compare Arkansas to neighboring states.

I research, prior to every PowerBall drawing, how much the NET check is for every state where that lottery is played.
Since the FEDERAL with holding for taxes is the same for every state, the difference is in the STATE income tax with held.

For Wednesday nights jackpot, a winner in Arkansas would receive AFTER with holding...
$82,144,000
the STATE taxes in Arkansas are...

$2,416,000 ....MORE...than a winner in Loisiana

$3,624,000......MORE....than a winner in Missouri
$3,624,000 .....MORE....than a winner in Oklahoma

$8,456,000 ....MORE.....than winners in TN or TX who have no STATE income tax
$8,456,000.....MORE.........than even CALIFORNIA which has NO STATE INCOME TAX on lottery winnings.

It might be different if we had no sales tax but the greedy state has a sales tax on nearly everything.

Posted 12 February 2018, 7:19 p.m. Suggest removal

carpenterretired says...

Well with enough tax cuts Arkansas can equal Brownback's Kansas ,as to lottery players they are living proof of the validity of the mathematical odds of lottery players being losers .

Posted 12 February 2018, 7:28 p.m. Suggest removal

GeneralMac says...

tiredcarpenter................They say your odds of getting hit by lightning are way better than winning the lottery but I personally know many people who won a big lottery and know NO ONE who got hit by lightning.

Posted 12 February 2018, 7:34 p.m. Suggest removal

GeneralMac says...

Taxes on the rich WAAAAY higher in Arkansas than in any neighboring state ?

At least Asa Hutchinson realizes that is not going to attract high wage earners.

Maybe Barack HUSSEIN Obama would say that sky high taxes ............" it's the right thing to do "..... (then deliberately close his mouth tight asnd make an arrogant face at the rich from Arkansas.

Asa Hutchinson wouldn't because he is not a divider and has more class than to make faces at citizens.

Posted 12 February 2018, 9:15 p.m. Suggest removal

Log in to comment