Let's have a parade! Or not

The White House is forging ahead with plans for the latest Trump-inspired spectacle: a huge military parade through the streets of Washington.

Tanks rumbling down the streets. Missiles poised atop launchers. Soldiers saluting the fearless leader perched imperiously in his viewing box as a marching band plays. Generals standing smartly in black convertible limousines ... oh wait, that's the annual Russian Victory Day celebration in May.

And it's nothing to emulate.

Defense Secretary Jim Mattis said the parade plan reflects Trump's respect for the armed forces. But we're with the skeptics, including members of Congress from both parties, retired military leaders and veterans who brand this as a misguided exercise in chest-thumping. "Confidence is silent and insecurity is loud," says Sen. John Kennedy (R-Louisiana). How did North Korea tyrant Kim Jong Un celebrate the opening ceremony of the Olympics in neighboring South Korea? With a big military parade.

Seems to us this Trumptastic idea falls more in line with the president's unseemly bragging about the size of his ... nuclear arsenal. The mightiest military in the world doesn't need to peacock its weaponry to intimidate enemies and comfort citizens.

We hope that Mattis and his Pentagon planners tell Trump that a vein-popping display of military might isn't the way to show his respect for the nation's soldiers. Beefing up health care for veterans is. Making sure that soldiers have the latest gear and a clear mission when put in harm's way is. Updating and streamlining the nation's nuclear arsenal as a deterrent is.

Editorial on 02/13/2018


RBear says...

If this parade actually happens, it will show the world our president is more like Putin than Trudeau or May or Merkle. In other words, leaders of peaceful nations do NOT show off their military might, opting for acts of diplomacy and peace. Regardless, the District has already voiced their opposition to such an idea.
From WaPo, "An obvious cost of a military parade would be repaving asphalt wrecked by tanks and other heavy vehicles riding down Pennsylvania Avenue, last repaved after Trump’s inauguration. One of the U.S. Army’s most common armored vehicles, the Bradley Fighting Vehicle, for example, weighs 27.6 tons — about 14 times heavier than a 2016 Chrysler 300 sedan."

Posted 13 February 2018, 11:45 a.m. Suggest removal

WGT says...

No parade. The money in this nation must be released to help our veterans. Pay their medical bills. Buy them homes. Whatever they need.

Posted 15 February 2018, 6:32 a.m. Suggest removal

Log in to comment